Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Feed
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB Playground

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. News
  4. A driver who plowed through a group of cyclists in Arizona, killing 2 and injuring 11, faces a one year prison sentence. His driver’s license will also be suspended for six months.

A driver who plowed through a group of cyclists in Arizona, killing 2 and injuring 11, faces a one year prison sentence. His driver’s license will also be suspended for six months.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
news
7 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    dwz@lemmy.world
    wrote last edited by
    #1
    This post did not contain any content.
    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D dwz@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      L This user is from outside of this forum
      L This user is from outside of this forum
      lennee@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      misdemeanor? so like, murder is illegal, murdering multiple with a truck is kind of legal

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L lennee@lemmy.world

        misdemeanor? so like, murder is illegal, murdering multiple with a truck is kind of legal

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        cmdrshepard49@sh.itjust.works
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Meanwhile a couple of parents in North Carolina are facing manslaughter charges after they let their kids walk to the grocery store while they guided them over the phone and one of them got hit and killed by a car.

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C cmdrshepard49@sh.itjust.works

          Meanwhile a couple of parents in North Carolina are facing manslaughter charges after they let their kids walk to the grocery store while they guided them over the phone and one of them got hit and killed by a car.

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          boddhisatva@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          And the driver has not been charged.

          fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zoneF 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B boddhisatva@lemmy.world

            And the driver has not been charged.

            fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
            fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zoneF This user is from outside of this forum
            fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            I sure hope so, the kid basically ran into traffic. No crosswalk, completely unsupervised.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zoneF fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone

              I sure hope so, the kid basically ran into traffic. No crosswalk, completely unsupervised.

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              boddhisatva@lemmy.world
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Ran into traffic?

              A witness said Legend stepped into the street and was struck before his older brother could pull him back.

              The driver struck a slow moving child who witnesses said had stepped off the curb and into the street. Stepped, not ran. The car then struck him before his brother could pull him back. There is no law against what these parents did. The driver on the other hand had an obligation to be aware of her surroundings including the children on the sidewalk beside the street who might step or fall into the street.

              It also doesn't matter if the child was unsupervised. Did your parents keep you on a leash? Do you keep your kids on a leash? Even if the parent was there, the child could still have stepped off the curb and been killed. If the brother wasn't fast enough to pull him back, then then there is no basis to assume that the parent necessarily would have been.

              Kids, unsupervised or not, do dumb things. The onus is on the driver to slow down when a potential hazard is spotted and to take steps to avoid it. Now, without more information about the setting I cannot say whether or not the driver should be charged. Maybe the kid wasn't visible to the approaching driver, for example. But if the parents are being charged when there is no crime or real negligence, then the driver should be too and the courts can sort it out.

              O 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B boddhisatva@lemmy.world

                Ran into traffic?

                A witness said Legend stepped into the street and was struck before his older brother could pull him back.

                The driver struck a slow moving child who witnesses said had stepped off the curb and into the street. Stepped, not ran. The car then struck him before his brother could pull him back. There is no law against what these parents did. The driver on the other hand had an obligation to be aware of her surroundings including the children on the sidewalk beside the street who might step or fall into the street.

                It also doesn't matter if the child was unsupervised. Did your parents keep you on a leash? Do you keep your kids on a leash? Even if the parent was there, the child could still have stepped off the curb and been killed. If the brother wasn't fast enough to pull him back, then then there is no basis to assume that the parent necessarily would have been.

                Kids, unsupervised or not, do dumb things. The onus is on the driver to slow down when a potential hazard is spotted and to take steps to avoid it. Now, without more information about the setting I cannot say whether or not the driver should be charged. Maybe the kid wasn't visible to the approaching driver, for example. But if the parents are being charged when there is no crime or real negligence, then the driver should be too and the courts can sort it out.

                O This user is from outside of this forum
                O This user is from outside of this forum
                openpassageways@lemmy.zip
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                Yeah I agree it's fucked up that the parents are in trouble and the driver isn't. The article says the driver is 76... The father probably was jailed mostly for having the wrong skin color.

                I walked to school more blocks than that at a younger age. The article says the state doesn't have laws that specify what age the kids must be supervised at to leave their own home. This happened mere blocks from where they lived.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Feed