Corbyn is good on Gaza, but he is terrible on literally everything else. He is a huge supporter of Putin and russian genocidal imperialism as well.

Wow I don't know if I've ever come across anyone who holds all of those specific opinions. It's genuinely interesting to me. I'd have expected "he's a raging antisemite" instead of "good on Gaza", given the rest of what you said

Or is it when you say "literally everything else" do you just mean "other foreign policy stuff"?

Wow I don't know if I've ever come across anyone who holds all of those specific opinions. It's genuinely interesting to me. I'd have expected "he's a raging antisemite" instead of "good on Gaza", given the rest of what you said

Or is it when you say "literally everything else" do you just mean "other foreign policy stuff"?

Corbyn is good on Gaza, but he is terrible on literally everything else. He is a huge supporter of Putin and russian genocidal imperialism as well.

This commenter is just understandably misled by the UK media's decades-long smear campaign. He is absolutely not "a huge supporter of Putin and russian genocidal imperialism as well", if you take a look at his history of words and actions.

How is he not a supporter of Russian gencidal imperialism? He openly supports the annexation of Crimea (and by extension the prosecution of Ukrainian speakers and Crimean Tartars in occupied territories). He is also huge supporter of russian propaganda resources.

I am more aware of his tankie foreign policy views (I am not from the UK), but based on discussions with friends who do live there, his economic policies are also uninspired (nationalizations etc.) even if you are left leaning.

How is supporting the annexation of Crimea (just one example in context of Ukraine, there are many more) not open support for russian genocidal imperialism?

The fucker openly works with russian propaganda/intel services. This has nothing to do with the UK media.

Repeating it doesn't make it true. How are you not a supporter of Russian genocidal imperialism?

the only way komrad korbyn will get his authoritarian chum farage elected is by splitting the left vote. the most effective way to do that is to abuse the only issue his non-party has and have a show trial. i notice historians are not on the list of the invited.

and how will this help gazans? not in the slightest, but that was never the point and who really ever gave a damn about peace in gaza anyway?

https://www.google.com/search?q=Corbyn+support+Crimea+annexation

Yep as I expected, nothing about supporting the annexation or openly working with Russian propaganda/intel services. In fact what I'm seeing from googling that is many examples of him actually publicly condemning the Russian governments actions over the years, including the invasion of Ukraine. If he's under Russian employ as you say, I'm very surprised they didn't fire him years ago

But yeah you're clearly someone who sees the Ukrainian government and NATO as perfect and could never do anything wrong and will continue to do so. So anyone who says even slightly different is worthy to be demonised by you, whether it's actually true or not they even said anything like that. And before you accuse me of being a "Russia sympathiser" or whatever I completely believe Russia is the aggressor and that we should be supoorting Ukraine. Just not that Ukraine and NATO have been 100% good themselves

Like, for instance, it's also funny that people can't see that NATO are loving the invasion. It means they don't have to all openly go to war with Russia to severely weaken it, something they've always wanted. They can just use Ukraine in a proxy war and allow the country and people to suffer all the hardships while the rest of NATO just pump Ukraine with war funding and the politicians in government in those countries get an easy win in popularity. Starmer is a great example of this, just about everything he's done is unpopular and the UK population for the most part are at the very least disappointed in him. The only time he was really popular was when he was all nice to Zelenskyy after the terrible Trump meeting he went through. Which is exactly what Starmer should have done of course, but it just shows how much of an easy goal it is

Repeating it doesn't make it true. How are you not a supporter of Russian genocidal imperialism?

Your starting point was a web search! Corbyn is a huge promoter or russian propaganda on NATO, his fake peacnik organization recognized Crimea as part of russia.

Ukraine and NATO have not been good? What does that even mean?

That's a russian propaganda narrative. You don't speak Ukrainian (or russian) and you've never even lived in Ukraine (Donbas or any other part).

Get the fuck out of here with your "NATO is at fault" and "proxy war" bullshit, you ignorant, lazy, dishonest, fake leftist! A real leftist would recognise that countries have the right to self determination.

Can you provide interviews or clips where he's been a promoter of russian propaganda?

• He has worked with RT, a Russian propaganda service aimed at the west managed by russian intel services.
• He routinely promotes russian propaganda narratives about NATO
• His fake peacenik organization (he is the executive director who is responsible for such press releases) recognized russia as part of Ukraine.
• He openly opposed weapons deliveries to Ukraine after the full scale in order to give russia an edge in the invasion

I don't even need to do a web search to write out these points. Who would have thought that in a country being invaded by russia for 11 years out of its 34 years of independence, the media would report on Western leaders collaborating with russians?

Or do you think we are all dumb eastern european sour cream n1ggaz who don't have journalism?

You can look up the sources for the abovementioned points, it's not difficult. Or assume I am lying, whatever works for you.

Wow I don't know if I've ever come across anyone who holds all of those specific opinions. It's genuinely interesting to me. I'd have expected "he's a raging antisemite" instead of "good on Gaza", given the rest of what you said

Or is it when you say "literally everything else" do you just mean "other foreign policy stuff"?

• He has worked with RT, a Russian propaganda service aimed at the west managed by russian intel services.
• He routinely promotes russian propaganda narratives about NATO
• His fake peacenik organization (he is the executive director who is responsible for such press releases) recognized russia as part of Ukraine.
• He openly opposed weapons deliveries to Ukraine after the full scale in order to give russia an edge in the invasion

I don't even need to do a web search to write out these points. Who would have thought that in a country being invaded by russia for 11 years out of its 34 years of independence, the media would report on Western leaders collaborating with russians?

Or do you think we are all dumb eastern european sour cream n1ggaz who don't have journalism?

You can look up the sources for the abovementioned points, it's not difficult. Or assume I am lying, whatever works for you.

you think we are all dumb eastern european sour cream n1ggaz

wow steady on my dude

You're making the statements, you bring the receipts.

I am just highlighting how this comes off as.

The gall to assume I am just making shit up because I hate daddy Corbyn. Not mention thinking that our Ukrainian-language media (and even english language media run by Ukrainian diaspora in places like Canada) lack integrity to validate such reporting.

Height of arrogance, racism even.