Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Feed
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB Playground

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. memes
  4. Let's update...

Let's update...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved memes
memes
20 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
    This post did not contain any content.
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    theleadensea@sh.itjust.works
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    presses the big blue 'update' button in GNOME Software in Fedora

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
      This post did not contain any content.
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      F This user is from outside of this forum
      friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      ujust update

      Z 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
        This post did not contain any content.
        comradenokotan@lemmy.zipC This user is from outside of this forum
        comradenokotan@lemmy.zipC This user is from outside of this forum
        comradenokotan@lemmy.zip
        wrote last edited by comradenokotan@lemmy.zip
        #10

        I saw someone on ml point out that update should come before upgrade

        Sauce

        bleistift2@sopuli.xyzB 1 Reply Last reply
        4
        • comradenokotan@lemmy.zipC comradenokotan@lemmy.zip

          I saw someone on ml point out that update should come before upgrade

          Sauce

          bleistift2@sopuli.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
          bleistift2@sopuli.xyzB This user is from outside of this forum
          bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          update pulls the metadata about your packages (to see if there are new versions, and which), while upgrade applies the patches.

          Z 1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • bleistift2@sopuli.xyzB bleistift2@sopuli.xyz

            update pulls the metadata about your packages (to see if there are new versions, and which), while upgrade applies the patches.

            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            Z This user is from outside of this forum
            zwiebel@feddit.org
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            I've never understood why the update part isn't included in the upgrade command, since upgrade is useless without it

            1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • F friend_of_satan@lemmy.world

              ujust update

              Z This user is from outside of this forum
              Z This user is from outside of this forum
              zwiebel@feddit.org
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              Isn't that just topgrade

              F 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Z zwiebel@feddit.org

                Isn't that just topgrade

                F This user is from outside of this forum
                F This user is from outside of this forum
                friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
                wrote last edited by friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
                #14

                I'm honestly not sure. https://github.com/ublue-os/bazzite/blob/main/system_files/desktop/shared/usr/share/ublue-os/just/10-update.just

                The bazzite motd says use ujust

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • R redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                  OP hasn't used AUR much

                  eldritch@piefed.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eldritch@piefed.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eldritch@piefed.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  You don't even have to use the aur are to have breaking changes. Most recently they changed how vlc was packaged. And broke it causing a lot of problems for users.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • eldritch@piefed.worldE eldritch@piefed.world

                    You don't even have to use the aur are to have breaking changes. Most recently they changed how vlc was packaged. And broke it causing a lot of problems for users.

                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                    R This user is from outside of this forum
                    redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    That's pretty rare. I ran arch for years and my only issues were from AUR or trying to update extremely out of date machines.

                    eldritch@piefed.worldE 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • H henfredemars@infosec.pub

                      Really should keep that PPA use to a minimum. They're potentially a source of not just instability but possible malware as you're putting a lot of trust in whoever maintains that resource.

                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      M This user is from outside of this forum
                      manxu@piefed.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      Especially because there is no way to limit the packages installed from a PPA AFAIK. If the PPA has a "new" version of NGINX, or of libc, or of Wayland - you get it, too!!!

                      H Z 2 Replies Last reply
                      1
                      • M manxu@piefed.social

                        Especially because there is no way to limit the packages installed from a PPA AFAIK. If the PPA has a "new" version of NGINX, or of libc, or of Wayland - you get it, too!!!

                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        H This user is from outside of this forum
                        henfredemars@infosec.pub
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        Absolutely. Ideally you should have zero PPAs. There’s definitely a cost for using this feature. Most commonly it comes in the form of instability when you end up with incompatible or broken packages because the maintainer wasn’t an active enough role. YMMV!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                          That's pretty rare. I ran arch for years and my only issues were from AUR or trying to update extremely out of date machines.

                          eldritch@piefed.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                          eldritch@piefed.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                          eldritch@piefed.world
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          I've run arch for years as well. It happens nearly yearly. I've had updates break completely several times. Partial updates. That required significant manual intervention. Etc Etc Etc. Meanwhile my Debian and fedora systems haven't had a hitch in years.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M manxu@piefed.social

                            Especially because there is no way to limit the packages installed from a PPA AFAIK. If the PPA has a "new" version of NGINX, or of libc, or of Wayland - you get it, too!!!

                            Z This user is from outside of this forum
                            Z This user is from outside of this forum
                            zorro@lemmy.world
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            You can set packages from a particular repo to a lower priority so that they are only installed when you expressly ask for them

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Feed