Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Feed
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB Playground

  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. memes
  4. Let's update...

Let's update...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved memes
memes
32 Posts 21 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com

    That's pretty rare. I ran arch for years and my only issues were from AUR or trying to update extremely out of date machines.

    eldritch@piefed.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
    eldritch@piefed.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
    eldritch@piefed.world
    wrote last edited by
    #19

    I've run arch for years as well. It happens nearly yearly. I've had updates break completely several times. Partial updates. That required significant manual intervention. Etc Etc Etc. Meanwhile my Debian and fedora systems haven't had a hitch in years.

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • M manxu@piefed.social

      Especially because there is no way to limit the packages installed from a PPA AFAIK. If the PPA has a "new" version of NGINX, or of libc, or of Wayland - you get it, too!!!

      Z This user is from outside of this forum
      Z This user is from outside of this forum
      zorro@lemmy.world
      wrote last edited by
      #20

      You can set packages from a particular repo to a lower priority so that they are only installed when you expressly ask for them

      M 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Z zorro@lemmy.world

        You can set packages from a particular repo to a lower priority so that they are only installed when you expressly ask for them

        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        manxu@piefed.social
        wrote last edited by
        #21

        How does one do that, Wise Zorro?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • eldritch@piefed.worldE eldritch@piefed.world

          I've run arch for years as well. It happens nearly yearly. I've had updates break completely several times. Partial updates. That required significant manual intervention. Etc Etc Etc. Meanwhile my Debian and fedora systems haven't had a hitch in years.

          R This user is from outside of this forum
          R This user is from outside of this forum
          redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          wrote last edited by
          #22

          I've moved on to gentoo. All the customization and if something breaks I can be sure it's my fault.

          eldritch@piefed.worldE 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • J jim3692@discuss.online
            nix flake update
            nixos-rebuild --switch --flake .
            
            # Just to keep an update history
            git add flake.lock
            git commit -m "update"
            

            This may seem like too much work, but it guarantees an all-or-nothing procedure. If some package is broken, the entire upgrade process is canceled, and the system remains in the state that it was.

            I have had a couple of partial upgrade cases on Arch. It was not fun live booting to repair it, every time this happened.

            somethingburger@jlai.luS This user is from outside of this forum
            somethingburger@jlai.luS This user is from outside of this forum
            somethingburger@jlai.lu
            wrote last edited by
            #23

            I've had updates fail on NixOS. A kernel update didn't generate the initramfs and the system wouldn't boot. Booting to a previous generation and reapplying the update fixed it.

            This is very rare, though, and unlike Arch can be fixed without a Live USB.

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • somethingburger@jlai.luS somethingburger@jlai.lu

              I've had updates fail on NixOS. A kernel update didn't generate the initramfs and the system wouldn't boot. Booting to a previous generation and reapplying the update fixed it.

              This is very rare, though, and unlike Arch can be fixed without a Live USB.

              J This user is from outside of this forum
              J This user is from outside of this forum
              jim3692@discuss.online
              wrote last edited by
              #24

              A kernel update didn't generate the initramfs

              This sounds like a bug on Nix configuration, or the kernel build process.

              If NixOS had caught the error, you wouldn't have gotten a faulty generation at all. This is different from pacman/apt/dnf, which will happily continue the upgrade, resulting in a broken system with no easy way to fix it.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                I've moved on to gentoo. All the customization and if something breaks I can be sure it's my fault.

                eldritch@piefed.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                eldritch@piefed.worldE This user is from outside of this forum
                eldritch@piefed.world
                wrote last edited by
                #25

                I haven't installed gentoo in 20 years. I still like arch for it's glaring flaws. And I do like BSDs ports etc. I probably should go through a gentoo install again to see how it changed. Last time I ran it. Was on a first generation Pentium.

                R 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Z zwiebel@feddit.org

                  I've never understood why the update part isn't included in the upgrade command, since upgrade is useless without it

                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  A This user is from outside of this forum
                  arsonbutcute@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  wrote last edited by
                  #26

                  Upgrade will upgrade the system to whatever is newest in your package cache. If, for example, you've just performed a partial upgrade and put yourself into an unsupported state, running upgrade without first running update will put your system back in line with itself.

                  There probably almost never a reason for this, but its the equivalent of running pacman -u which under normal circumstances you will never do

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • eldritch@piefed.worldE eldritch@piefed.world

                    You don't even have to use the aur are to have breaking changes. Most recently they changed how vlc was packaged. And broke it causing a lot of problems for users.

                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    nukenpave@lemmy.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #27

                    Or the Linux firmware package change that required manual intervention to resolve.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • T theleadensea@sh.itjust.works

                      presses the big blue 'update' button in GNOME Software in Fedora

                      venus_ziegenfalle@feddit.orgV This user is from outside of this forum
                      venus_ziegenfalle@feddit.orgV This user is from outside of this forum
                      venus_ziegenfalle@feddit.org
                      wrote last edited by
                      #28

                      Checks 'automatic updates' box in Discover

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • eldritch@piefed.worldE eldritch@piefed.world

                        I haven't installed gentoo in 20 years. I still like arch for it's glaring flaws. And I do like BSDs ports etc. I probably should go through a gentoo install again to see how it changed. Last time I ran it. Was on a first generation Pentium.

                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        R This user is from outside of this forum
                        redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                        wrote last edited by
                        #29

                        On a beefy machine it's nice. Chromium takes forever.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cm0002@lemmy.worldC cm0002@lemmy.world
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                          laser@feddit.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #30

                          The second y in Syyu is almost always unneeded and just wastes time and bandwidth. Is i remember correctly, it only makes sense when for example you switch mirrors

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • H henfredemars@infosec.pub

                            Really should keep that PPA use to a minimum. They're potentially a source of not just instability but possible malware as you're putting a lot of trust in whoever maintains that resource.

                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            thorhop@sopuli.xyz
                            wrote last edited by
                            #31

                            I think Fedora's COPR carries on the torch, besides Arch's AUR. But generally, yeah, avoid PPA's like the plague. It's been garbage for years now. You'd be better off actually compiling the software yourself.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • comradenokotan@lemmy.zipC comradenokotan@lemmy.zip

                              I saw someone on ml point out that update should come before upgrade

                              Sauce

                              V This user is from outside of this forum
                              V This user is from outside of this forum
                              victorz@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #32

                              I thought I remembered that correctly from my time with Ubuntu like 20 years ago.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Feed